Copy and paste the following in the comments and fill it in. Post both AFL Fantasy Classic and AFL Dream Team results.
Team Name:
Round 9 Scores:
How many players:
League Results:
Studs:
Duds:
On the Chopping Block:
Vent/Brag/Whatever:
Stay tuned to DT TALK this week for all of the great AFL Dream Team advice you could ever need!
Team Name: The Wookiee
Round 9 Scores: 1529
How many players: 18
League Results: not great
Studs: Langdon,Gibson,Swallow,Hibberd,Ablett,Dusty
Duds: Rocky donut,zorks,stevie,mcV,hooker,nroo these big names averaged 41.5 between them!
On the Chopping Block:too may to think about
Vent/Brag/Whatever: this was looking like my strongest bye week…not!
As i said in the other thread, mt team has too many reverse rookies, guys who start with a premium price and hack their way to a rookie price!
Thoughts on griffiths to bews and polec to jelwood
That’s what I’m doing. Bews be is -20 so he should make a tonne of money
Should I trade Crouch to Selwood, which leaves Polec on field, or Polec to Johnson/Pendlebury/Swan and have Crouch on field ? Not quite sure. Cheers
Crouch to selwood
Overall dropped from about 500 to about 2700. Bring on next week!
Crouch to selwood
cheers jacob
Is it worth doing Polec -> Jelwood?
Or should I Kolodjashnij to Jaensch?
If kolo plays go polec to jelwood
Can anyone say why tex lost money after getting 79? At $282k or whatever, surely his be was well below 80 as opposed to above as it apparently was?
Yeah I just asked that on the previous page of comments. He went in to the game with a BE of 57 so after scoring 79 should have gone up in price. Something not right.
I wonder if there’s an issue with some other BE’s as well…Cunningham scored just under his BE and lost $5k but his BE for this upcoming week is showing as 0!
Yeah same thing happened last week with Cunningham. Got 31, be of 30 but lost a couple of grand
OK so looks like all the bye players are listed with a BE of 0. Annoying because you need to see what it is if you are going to trade them out in terms of whether they still have money to make the following week.
That makes no sense. Tasty downgrade from zorko I reckon. Mmmmm.
BTW hallahan should milk some cash is -13 BE and looks to have a spot for next few weeks atleast
I’m probably a bit behind but I havent had to use it yet this year. Is it possible to do three way dpp swaps on fantasy?
U can involve 3 players in a trade.
So you can’t involve 4?
Not sure mate. I don’t think so. Haven’t tried it.
Ebert or Cornes?
Ebert
I was set on trading Dunstan and Cunningham out this week for jelwood. But seeing as thou after trades il only have 17 this wknd. My thoughts have changed. Option 1 Cunningham to charlie Cameron Dunstan to selwood
Or option 2 Zorko to walker
Dunstan to selwood
Next week I could then piss off Cunningham and Robertson.
My team this round should be
Simpson Swallow Bartel Kelly Langford
Ablett, Pendles, Beams, Cotchin, Selwood Polec, Hallahan
Jacobs **Currie**
Danger, Cloke , Martin
Team Name: Liam’s Boys
Round 9 Scores: 1850
How many players: 17
League Results: Decent
Studs: Dangerfield, Parker, Dustin, Gablett, Swallow, Cotchin, Beams, Langdon
Duds: Zorko, McVeigh. (Had a few rookies to fill in for bye players who scored <50)
On the Chopping Block: Zorko
Vent/Brag/Whatever: Fairly happy with my result this week. Zorko coming straight out, not sure who for yet. Team is shaping up nicely, depth everywhere. Thinking of downgrading Zorko to Walker and upgrading either Polec or Macrae to a premium mid.
Hodgeys HERO’S 2015 this week in AFL Fantasy. Overall ranking 1152 so good improvement am thinking Polec to j selwood this week. I am wondering whether to keep N Jones still 103 average but not sure if he can sustain it for the season? Cheers All
What kind of scoring system has taylor walker who scored 79points and valued at less than 300k actually losing money on that performance? The maths here is just wrong.
ignore, posted above already.
bring in jelwood or danger , also who is the best rookie to bring in do you think ?
Cameron, Bews or Beams
also, tough choice. I’d probably go Danger though, simply due to DPP
Bews and Cameron have negative BE’s and should make serious cash. Jelwood be is 95 and Dangers is 74 so both should go up in value. Probably safest to get on danger
Which one?
A: Robertson > Bews, R.Shaw > Jelwood (18 players exactly, better team in the long run with more premos)
OR
B: Montagna > Jelwood, Nroo > Dangerfield (19 players)
Get Bews in if he isn’t named sub (you get to see before you trade as it’s the Friday game). Don’t rage trade Monty, he’ll still go big and Jelwood is still risky. Nroo needs to go though
i was planning to bring in jelwood before his big score this week. i think he’ll come good in the long run.
you don’t think nroo will bounce back?
Swanny or Jelwood this week??
Im going jelwodd
Who’s a higher priority to trade: Crouch or Gleeson
my first trade is hickey (injured,bye) to jacobs leaving me with 13k
What should my scone trade be:
Rioli (injured) to walker leaving me with 141k
or
robertsen (bye) to bews via bartel DPP leaving me with 123k
THOUGHTS WOULD BE APPRECIATED!
Dr Bruce Reid
1701
19 players
W
Studs: Watson, Hibberd, Barlow, Ablett, Martin, Lagdon, J. Lloyd
Duds: Johnson, Hooker, Swan, Hampson, Crouch
Should I trade Hampson to Minson and Crouch to Hallahan ?
Team Name: Superswans
Round 9 Scores: 1879
How many players: 20
League Results: W
Studs: Ablett Watson Tyson Martin Parker Sallow
Duds:Swan Zorko NRoo
On the Chopping Block: Saint Nick for sure
Vent/Brag/Whatever: Pretty happy this week moving up 2300 spots , (and not happy my DT Talk avatar is missing)
Team Name: RooDawg
Round 9 Scores: 1983
How many players:
League Results: W W W – even beat the mighty Warne Dawgs
Studs: Swallow, Langdon, Ablett, Beam, Tyson, Dangerfield, Cotchin, Watson, J.Lloyd, Parker, Martin
Duds: Rockliff, Riewoldt, Zorko
On the Chopping Block: No idea… any suggestions? Someone hsa to make room for J.Selwood this week.
Vent/Brag/Whatever: 754th for the round and jumped to 2,897th overall!
Pre Round 10 Trades;
BAC: Simpson, Bartel, Swallow, Suckling, Enright, Langdon, (Hibberd, J.Tippett)
MID: Ablett, Beams, Macrae, Cotchin, Tyson, Hallahan, Langford, (Watson, Rockliff)
RUC: Sandilands, Jacobs, (Thurlow, Currie)
FWD: Dangerfield, Dahlhaus, Martin, Parker, Riewoldt, Zorko, (Z.Merrett, Ambrose)
Thinking of getting some cash montagna > Jelwood and Georgiou > J Bews. Thoughts on this trade?
Team Name: Spoon Winners 2k14
Round 9 Scores: 1793
How many players: 19
League Results: L W W
Studs: Dangerfield, Ablett, D.Swallow, Martin, Watson
Duds: Johnson, Swan, N.Riewoldt, Crouch, McVeigh
On the Chopping Block: Not sure what I’m doing with trades this week yet.
Vent/Brag/Whatever: Went with Rockliff as captain, that worked out well!
I have 20 players whose teams are playing next week but two of those will almost definitely not play.
Team Name:Pies for Prems
Round 9 Scores:1518
How many players:19
League Results:I dont want to talk about it
Studs:Langdon, Swallow, Watson, Parker, Martin
Duds: Hooker, SJ, Robertson, Zorko, Rocky, Griffiths, NRoo, Crouch
On the Chopping Block: Crouch, Ellis, Griffiths
Vent/Brag/Whatever: Brisbane single handedly cost me my first loss of the season. Not a happy chap
Team Name: Murraymagic
Round 9 Scores: 1633
How many players: 19
League Results: LWW
Studs: T.Langdon, M.Hibberd, D.Tyson, S.Jacobs, D.Martin, C.Cameron
Duds: J.McVeigh, D.Zorko, N.Riewoldt, S.Johnson, M.Crouch, D,Swan.
On the Chopping Block: N.Riewoldt, D.Zorko
Vent/Brag/Whatever: Disappointing effort by the Murraymagic team.
RDT
Team Name: Muppets
Round 9 Score: 1895
How many players: 20
League Results: WWWW
Studs: Pretty much anyone Vanilla and Lewis Taylor
Duds: Sando and Richardson for Crouch/Acres plus losing me money/easy upgrade potential, can’t really be too annoyed with anyone else bar McVeigh, Cutler was my 3rd worst score with 61 so he was the 18th
On the Chopping Block: Crouch, Cutler, Taylor
Vent/Brag/Whatever:
F*** YOU SANDO!!!!!! YOU PISSED ME OFF LAST YEAR WITH WRIGHTY THEN NOW YOU DO THIS TO CROUCHY, YOU ARE A FLOG SIR!!!! Ranked 110th now, have upgraded a bit over the byes but need to make the right calls this week on the trades.