Click here for 2023 Fantasy Classic prices.
Why should I pick him?
After 2 years away from the game, McKenna comes back with a 35% discount on his last average of 65 (BCV ADJ), pricing him at just 42. Priced 28 points below his career best average of 70 in 2019 when he was just 23 years old, he is someone we must consider.
McKenna goes up to sunny Brisbane to address a need for them being run and carry off of half back. From all reports he has shown plenty in match sim and intra clubs and it’s looking like he’ll be apart of their best 22 in 2023. Rich is the lions main distributor down back and he is not exactly a spring chicken, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them looking for McKenna often coming out of the back half.
With so much uncertainty over the premium defenders not named Sam Docherty, I believe Connor McKenna could be a great option to fill one of those D4/5 spots and possibly even put up a 75+ average while doing so.
Why shouldn’t I pick him?
Players in this price bracket are risky for a number of reasons, they can often end up in no-mans-land where they don’t make as much money as a rookie would but also don’t score as much as the premiums do. Players like this really need to pop early on to kickstart their cash gen otherwise they’re wasting a spot in your team.
McKenna hasn’t played in the AFL for almost 3 years now and you’d imagine there would be some kinks to work out before getting back to his best. The other thing with players in this price bracket is, you can always bring them in if the pop in round one because they’ll still be cheap, but often If you start them and they fail, they’re a nightmare to get rid of
Deck of DT Rating.
McKenna reminds me a lot of Oleg Markov in 2021, both in play style and fantasy prospects. He’s the sort of player that could make or break your season and definitely isn’t for the faint hearted. His role in our defence will be dependant on how many rookies we get come round one. He sits at D5 for me at the moment, but I need to see the right role in pre season for him to stay there.
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: @DTTALK for all things AFL Fantasy (and more). Got something to say about the Deck or AFL Fantasy in general? Join the conversation and use the hashtag… #AFLFantasy.
- Dan on Friday Fantasy Fill Up – Rd. 13: “agreed Warnie , windhager every day over Warner” Jun 10, 01:14
- Warnie on Friday Fantasy Fill Up – Rd. 13: “Windhager is averaging 33 or so because he was sub in three of his first six games. He scored 120,…” Jun 9, 22:21
- Will on Calvin’s Captains – Rd. 13: “English was absolutely dominating Lycett all game, he wasn’t injured. They had to sub him off and double up on…” Jun 9, 19:17
- lizardofoz on Friday Fantasy Fill Up – Rd. 13: “known” Jun 9, 18:48
- lizardofoz on Friday Fantasy Fill Up – Rd. 13: “I’m happy with Warner but Windhager had to be a dodgy selection. 66 from a know tagger averaging 33 or…” Jun 9, 18:47
OMG NOT COMMUNITY WRITERS !
How does McKenna compare to Hunt & Constable for D5? Any others in that price range to consider?
Hunt appears to have job security. The other 2 may or may not be round one candidates. I have a wait and see approach with the latter.
McKenna has played something like 76 career games for one score over 100. I have him penciled for an average of around 52.
Hunt has been a spud for most of his career. Last year from rounds 1-12 he had over 80% game time in 11 of those games. His highest score from those 12 games was a 57 from 77% game time. Then he played rounds 20-23 with a high score of 77 with over 80% game time in each of those games.
IF Constable is given a chance, I think he is capable of averaging 70. So of the three, it’s Constable for me.
73 you’re on crack