Connect with us


Versus – Round 7

Let’s go premium shopping.

G’day all. Just me again this week for Versus as Leighroy has no internet connection. Today, I’ve been allowed to put on my Crows hat a little bit and take a look at two of the more in-form players, Rory Sloane and Sam Jacobs. They will be put head-to-head with Rocky and Grundy – two blokes who are arguably the best available players in their respective lines. Just for your information, I’m aware many will be wondering why it is in-fact Jacobs who will be going up against Grundy over Brisbane’s Stef Martin. Quite frankly, I think Jacobs, with his BE of 53, will be above $600k in the blink of an eye and he provides that all important point of difference. Let’s get cracking!


Rory Sloane ($720,000) V Tom Rockliff ($701,000)  

Crows fans have grown accustomed to this elite standard from Sloane since he was taken with pick 44 back in 2008 – in hindsight another of the Crows draft steals. But it seems footy fans outside of SA are only beginning to fully appreciate the sheer brilliance of the man. Sloane runs at full tilt for the games entirety, wins more than his fair share of contested possessions but also spreads well from the stoppage, tackles hard and of-late has been impacting the scoreboard – as if the Crows needed another scoring option.

Image result for rory sloane suffering a cheekbone injury in the latter stages of the pre-season which saw him sidelined for the entirety of the JLT series, Sloane endured an under-par start to the season against GWS – scoring 68 Fantasy points. But after that warm up, he has quite frankly exploded. Sloane has averaged in excess of 100 just twice in his eight years at West Lakes (104 in 2014 and 105 in 2015) and is traditionally a consistent 90+ scorer without the ceiling of other notable premium midfielders. But over the past five weeks, he has not gone under 130. The remarkable run commenced at the MCG against the struggling Hawks. The Crows made up for the slow start and came home strongly with Sloane collecting 25 disposals, 6 marks, 15 tackles, a goal and 152 points. Sloaney then backed it up with 139 on the Power on his way to taking home the Showdown Medal. He has put up scores of 143, 132 and 152 on the previous three weekend and is leading the way in Adelaide’s fleet-footed midfield.

He, the Crouch brothers, Curtly Hampton and at-times Richard Douglas have all been a force on the inside this year, dishing it off to the likes of Cameron, Milera and Atkins. When looking at the stats and watching him play at the ground every second week, it’s evident Sloane has a very well-rounded game without any obvious weaknesses. He is not an ultimate ball-magnet like Matty Crouch but still accumulates his 25+ touches on most occasions. He is a ferocious tackler and currently leads the AFL with 58 – threatening to dislodge Tom Liberatore from his throne. Sloane also ranks as one of the highest goal scoring midfielder with 9 snags. He had a very good 2016 season and was rewarded with runner-up in the AFLPA and AFLCS most valuable player award. Also named as vice-captain in the All-Australian 22, Rory has gone to another level from a Fantasy perspective this year. The only flaw on him Fantasy wise is his price which, at $720,000, makes him the most expensive player in any line. Are you willing to pay this for a guy who, although is in impeccable form, has never averaged over 110?

Rocky is simply the greatest Fantasy player the DreamTeam Talk community has ever and perhaps will ever see. A natural footballer who isn’t particularly athletic or flashy and has been criticised for not always making every touch count, the pig, as he is better known as, finds the ball at will, has a good amount of contested possessions each game, collects his five marks and doesn’t mind a tackle or ten. Never before have we seen a player who goes 150+ so often. Rocky has always been a productive Fantasy scorer.

Image result for tom rockliff his debut year – where he scored 23 in his sole match – he has never averaged below 85 for a season. His 2014 season was perhaps the greatest of the modern Fantasy era. The numbers are ridiculous – he went under 100 just three times and in every other game bar one (102), Rockliff went 110+. Honestly, if he or anyone for that matter, gets close to those sort of numbers anytime soon I’ll be highly surprised. Although the opportunity to kick goals doesn’t always present itself as often as it should, Rocky was deployed as a forward for much of his junior career. A member of Victoria Country and the Murray Bushrangers under-18 squads, Rocky finished the under-18 carnival ranked 2nd for goals and goal assists. It’s scary to think he could get better, but if he could hit the scoreboard a little more often look out. It’s hard to believe Rocky was initially overlooked by recruiters, but the Lions picked him up with the fifth selection in the 2009 pre-season draft, and the Fantasy world has reaped the rewards. Rocky entered 2017 as the second most expensive player behind Dangerfield after an average of 116 last year.

So far he has certainly justified the hefty price tag with scores of 127, 123, 106, 157, 124 and 100. There good numbers, but all good coaches will know there’s still another level left in the pig. Injuries have threatened to derail his season over the past few years, not being able to feature in all 22 games since 2012. Don’t let his injury prone past stand in the way though. When it comes to midfielders, sure, there are more effective ones out there. But no-one can match Rocky’s blend between consistency and ceiling, ultimately concluding in a 120+ score more often than not. Arguably the figure-head of AFL Fantasy, the former Lions skipper will likely have a few more season in him before the likes of Merrett, Bontempelli and Cripps ascend to the top. You’ll want him when he inevitably goes 160+.

Comparison: Straight up, you really can’t go wrong with either. Despite Sloane recently picking up the AFLPA player of the month award and averaging a massive 131 Fantasy points, I just can’t see him averaging over 110. Rocky on the other hand will do just that and more, especially with Beams now sidelined for a few weeks. You can put your house on it. The Fantasy pig it is, but Sloaney will be a top eight mid.


Brodie Grundy ($616,000) V Sam Jacobs ($556,000)

Last year Collingwood star Brodie Grundy launched himself into the elite category. After enduring a positive first two years at AFL level under the guidance of Darren Jolly. Since then the number one ruck role has been his for the taking – and he certainly has made the most of it. An aggressive tackler and strong contested mark, Brodie has also proven he can kick a goal when pushed forward (although we are yet to see much of that in 2017). Grundy averaged 91 Fantasy points in 2015 before hitting triple figures last year.

Image result for brodie grundy an undisputed premo ruck, Grundy’s Fantasy game is on the up. Whether he will manage to hit the heights of Gawn in ’16 or Stef in ’14 and ’15 remains to be seen. But he’s definitely giving those two a decent run for their money. As will be alluded to below in Jacobs piece, the traditional pathway for today’s premier ruckmen is to be selected in the rookie draft before taking a few years to further develop and learn the tricks of the trade. This wasn’t the case with Brodie. The Sturt product joined a rare club when the Magpies took him in the first round of the 2012 draft – pick 18 to be precise. Grundy was thrown into the deep end and has bucked the trend successfully. Could the same be done with the Bulldogs Tim English? We’re expecting hundreds week in week out from Grundy, and he has delivered three in his six matches, to go with 94, 86 and 93.

With Toby Nankervis summoned to the sidelines for a week for a cheeky elbow on David Mackay, this round could prove to be the perfect time to upgrade him to a set-and-forget big man. More than half the comp will be faced with this dilemma and with Gawn unavailable, Grundy is next in-line. The so called Mason Cox effect, in which the American bean pole offers relief to Grundy at stages is a bit of a worry as Grundy has missed the ton in every game Cox has taken part in this season. I’d back him to rectify this soon enough.

If given their time again, I’m pretty confident the Blues wouldn’t have traded the leagues most brilliant small forward Eddie Betts and one of the better rucks in Sam Jacobs. However they have both landed in the nations south and are currently instrumental cogs in the Crows record-breaking line-up. Jacobs, or Sauce, was born in the small Yorke Peninsula town of Ardrossan which currently boasts a population of just under 1,200 people. As is the case with many ruckman currently inhabiting an AFL list, Jacobs was taken as a rookie. The Blues, who had previously selected fellow South Australian Bryce Gibbs with the number one pick of the national draft, took the gamble on the 202cm big man who’s extremely high durability has seen him play as the sole ruck for seven years – missing only a handful of games in the process. Sauce also has excellent work rate, allowing him to get to a high amount stoppages.

Image result for sam jacobs, who played only 16 matches for Carlton, is a neat user of the ball for someone of his size. His link up play both by hand and foot is at-times invaluable. A perfect example of this unfolded on Sunday, where he racked up 15 kicks and 11 handballs. To put that into perspective, Jacobs found more of the sherrin than Tigers gun on-baller Dustin Martin. This season, Sauce has confronted fellow number one ruckmen Shane Mumford, Ben McEvoy, Patty Ryder, Matthew Leuenberger, Jarrad Witts and Toby Nankervis, recording hit-out hauls of 28, 43, 42, 33, 34 and 50. These impressive numbers have him currently sat in fourth for total hit-outs. It’s worth noting that key forward Josh Jenkins, who often gives Jacobs a chop out in the ruck, was missing for the best part of round two and the next three clashes. However Sauce utterly dominated Nank and the return of JJ looks unlikely to have much of an effect on Jacobs Fantasy ability. Sammy is fresh of a 158 and whilst we can’t be expecting that every week, he is amongst the top handful of ruck options (at least until Gawn returns) and available for just $556,000. Has never averaged below 87 since joining Adelaide. Definitely someone to think about.

 Put simply, I would sway to the side of safety and go Grundy. He will likely lift his average to 105 and, whilst Jacobs is in tremendous form, costs less, with a low BE and high ceiling, should be selected before Sauce.



  1. PK

    May 4, 2017 at 9:35 am

    Sloane can’t average 130 all season in my opinion.. Rockliff can & has. Would love to be proven wrong though!

    • beliethat

      May 4, 2017 at 10:22 am

      if he doesn’t get injured Sloane will slaughter the comp

  2. Euman


    May 4, 2017 at 9:43 am

    Ok so my dilemma is this I have rocky and I have cash – should I pursue Sloane or a cheaper Ablett or Merrett or Titch? So question is Sloane, Ablett,Merrett or Titch?

    • Euman


      May 4, 2017 at 9:44 am

      To clarify I don’t mean get rid of rocky I mean I have him so he is not on my list of wants

    • nata09

      May 4, 2017 at 9:49 am

      Depends if you need consistency you can’t go wrong with titch or Merret
      Sloane is overpriced imo wait for him to have a stinker

    • yeahrowdyhitthat

      May 4, 2017 at 10:51 am

      I think Titch (and likely doing the same this week). Ultra reliable and consistent and has the late bye. I don’t know about you but I still have 14-15 players in the first of the three bye rounds. Trades this week mean I get Titch and bring that number down to 13. Aiming for Treloar next week as he will hopefully be tagged this week and will drop another $20k.

    • The Janitor

      May 4, 2017 at 2:00 pm

      Make your own decisions Euman, you mug.

      • Euman


        May 4, 2017 at 2:07 pm

        Oh stop it now you’ve hurt my feelings you big bully

    • John

      May 4, 2017 at 3:55 pm

      Don’t pull the trigger on Ablett before his bye round. I’ve had slone since round 2 and he hasn’t let me down! I would prefer him over merret personally. Mitchell is a very safe and consistent option too

  3. nata09

    May 4, 2017 at 9:52 am

    Rocky and parson/Myers or whoever is named +130k
    Heeney and Steven

    • yeahrowdyhitthat

      May 4, 2017 at 10:55 am

      Whatever works best for team balance and byes. Honestly either would be great for different reasons. The latter gives you two players that offer great value currently and will be points of difference. The first gives you the best player in fantasy and a rookie priced guy who will likely go up $150-200k before the byes.

    • Euman


      May 4, 2017 at 2:09 pm

      tough call Rocky is a must IMO. I have him all year and just swapped roughy for Heeny. I would go for the Rock first IMO

      • nata09

        May 4, 2017 at 3:55 pm

        Alright thanks very much
        Rocky it is

        • Zack

          May 4, 2017 at 7:23 pm

          Sloane or Ablett? Can’t decide.

  4. Swanny

    May 4, 2017 at 10:15 am

    What is everyone’s thoughts on Big Boy? Don’t have the cash to go up to either Sauce or Grundy (mainly because I want to go with beamer to zerret)
    Had scored 100s in his last 3 weeks, has a be of 37 and is up against ruckless Melbourne?

    • yeahrowdyhitthat

      May 4, 2017 at 11:06 am

      Short term probably couldn’t go wrong. He might do well for covering bye rounds and then upgrade after that (or if he peaks in value/has a stinker beforehand).

      Long term he wouldn’t be in the top 4 rucks I wouldn’t think so not a keeper.

  5. Will


    May 4, 2017 at 10:50 am

    Sloane has done this before – averaged around 127 from round 11-16 last year then averaged 100 for the rest of the H&A season. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a big crows fan and love Sloaney and want him to continue to smash it and get that charlie, but I’m not convinced that he will have the season long consistency of a Rocky, Swanny or prime GAJ.

    I like Sloane for a more unique option than Rocky, but it just feels like paying overs a bit, getting him in after his best patch of form of his career.

    • yeahrowdyhitthat

      May 4, 2017 at 11:15 am

      Yeah I’d love to have him and if my bye structures were in better shape I probably would still jump on. Form his hard to overlook and if something happens well you can downgrade to a fallen premium and maybe still come away in great shape.

      However – he had some big scores last year, but also had the following scores:

      Rd 1-3: 79,67,88
      Rd 7: 74
      Rd 10: 81
      Rd 18: 76
      Rd 21-EF: 81,96,84

      Still not horrible scores, but if you pay $720k for someone you don’t want to see under 100 that many times (and particularly not around fantasy finals).

      2015 he had injuries which definitely affected him, but still – in rounds 4-19 he only had 1x 100 and 5 scores of 76 or less, and missed 6 games.

      As long as people are aware he won’t always go 140 then go for it!

    • Zeddy

      May 4, 2017 at 12:58 pm

      Same can be said about Danger, last year was the first time he averaged over 105, and only his 3rd season ever going 100+. People were saying the same thing about him as they are Sloane.

      • yeahrowdyhitthat

        May 4, 2017 at 5:00 pm

        True – not saying don’t do it, as with 99% of Fantasy trades there’s a risk v reward element.

  6. Alex

    May 4, 2017 at 11:09 am

    Is Preuss to T.Boyd and J.Watson to Yeo a good move or should I look for a cheaper option over Yeo?

    • Alex

      May 4, 2017 at 11:10 am

      Nank is my R2 btw hence the Preuss trade

    • yeahrowdyhitthat

      May 4, 2017 at 11:19 am

      I’m pretty confident Preuss will play. But if not, personally I’d try to get Hanners or someone like that who is a Premo that has dropped in value. I’m an Eagles fan and love Yeo when he is running hot, but his away games and threat of a tag worry me when it comes to fantasy.

  7. Confused

    May 4, 2017 at 11:17 am

    Ignoring the Rd 9 bye who should I bring in first between Rocky, Merrett or Ablett?
    I am currently thinking Rocky especially as his next 2 games are against Sydney and Hawthorn, the 2 teams giving up the most points.

    Any help appreciated.

    • yeahrowdyhitthat

      May 4, 2017 at 11:22 am

      I’d go them in that exact order for the exact reason you listed!

  8. CJ

    May 4, 2017 at 11:22 am

    Was leaning towards Sloane for Beams but I think I have to go with consistency and bring in the pig. Maybe Sloane can be my next upgrade. Thinking it’s time to move Fyfe on anyways.

  9. Diesel

    May 4, 2017 at 11:28 am

    I think at this stage Sloane quite hasn’t earned the right to be compared to Rocky. I still think they are different gravy. Sloane is a stud and has been a premium for years but he is prone to the odd 60-70 game. Rocky’s ‘bad’ games are still 90s.

  10. j

    May 4, 2017 at 12:07 pm

    Wouldn’t Sloan have to average something poor like 95 for the rest of the season to dip down to 110?

    I don’t see this happening, nor do i see him maintaining 130. He should, however, comfortably do 115+ by years end.

    • Tom

      May 4, 2017 at 12:25 pm

      We paid 712k for Dangerfield for 118 avg at the start of the season. That’s 26 points less than Sloane’s averaging from his last 5 games. Sloane only needs to average 113 for the rest of the season to finish with a 118 point average. That’s 31 points less than he’s averaging from his last 5 games. There’s no reason for his scores to drop anywhere close to that much anyway. I don’t see much risk in picking him at his price. There’s more risk going without him because he is currently averaging (last 5) 20 points more than the next best in Zach Merrett, and if he continues that he will become very out of reach.

      • antongus1

        May 4, 2017 at 12:37 pm

        It is a bit of a flawed argument though, you are paying for his average from this round onwards not his season average.

        At 720k (priced at 120) he needs to average 120 for the rest of the year for it to be a good pick. If he averages 110 from here on (which is still really good) you are probably overpaying 50k and can look elsewhere.

        • Tom

          May 4, 2017 at 12:41 pm

          Yeah I did consider that. Do you see his average dropping by 24 though? (excluding his first game)

          • antongus1

            May 4, 2017 at 1:07 pm

            I don’t see him averaging over 120 – he is averaging over 1 goal per game in his last 5, he won’t hold that for the rest of the year. His last 3 games have also been Adelaide steam rolling teams, they won’t do it every week for the whole year.

            Lots of players have gone on 5 game streaks before like this (maybe not as high but more or less similar), yet the only ones who have been consistent are Swan, Ablett and Rockliff. I don’t think Sloane has the junk potential like those three had, he relies heavily on tackles throughout the game.

        • Diesel

          May 4, 2017 at 12:45 pm

          People sometimes forget you are bringing in potential, not guaranteed scores. If you had Sloane from the start, you’d be laughing but not so sure it’s a great idea to bring him in now for that obscene price especially when someone 100K cheaper could average the same from here on out. Same thing happened with Murphy. I can understand maybe spending that money in forward and defence where quality is few and far between but there is too much options in the midfield. Each to their own though.

      • Kreb

        May 4, 2017 at 12:42 pm

        So disregard the first game? It’s an extreme anomaly if Merrett does anything close to that.

        Sloane – 8 scores of under 90 since start of last year (9 inc EF)
        Merrett – 2 (one being 89)

        Sloane’s had five good games to start the year. We’ve seen mid-tier premiums do it all the time. Marc Murphy, Hall, I remember Brent Stanton used to start every year averaging 130 and then have it flatten out towards the middle. Consistency is what brings high season averages.

      • Tom

        May 4, 2017 at 1:15 pm

        Fair points lads, good discussion.

      • Tom

        May 4, 2017 at 1:17 pm

        Would you say Rocky/Merrett are much better options to bring in now given his proven history? Or would you still be looking at better value?

        • Diesel

          May 4, 2017 at 1:32 pm

          Put it this way, if I HAD to spend 720K then Rocky is the only one I’d be feeling comfortable to bring in. However, I think there are still so much value in the 610-530 range.

    • Kreb

      May 4, 2017 at 12:29 pm

      If he averaged 102 from here on he’d be 110 for the year.

      • Euman


        May 4, 2017 at 2:42 pm

        thoughts then on Ablett is he back?

    • Maz1no

      May 4, 2017 at 3:50 pm

      To end the season with an average of 110, Sloane would need to average 102 for the remainder of his games this season.

      I do maths, you can trust me.

      • Maz1no

        May 4, 2017 at 3:51 pm

        Kreb’s too fast for me, sorry, didn’t scroll all the way to the bottom.

  11. n bring Nank on to field

    May 4, 2017 at 12:23 pm

    Hi Cal,

    Am I better off Trading Nakervis and Beams out for 2 decent players or am I better off Trading a Rook for a Rook then upgrading Beams.

    Laird, Lloyd, Marchbank
    Hampton, Ottens, Newman ( Stewart, EVW)

    Rocky, Titch, Danger, Murphy
    Gaff, Fyfe, Beams, WHE ((Fox, SPP)

    Martin, Kruz (Preuss, Cameron)

    Macrae, D’house, ANB
    Nank,Parfitt, JKH (Balic, Polson)

    • Greg

      May 4, 2017 at 5:06 pm

      If I was in your situation I would be holding Nank and playing Balic. Get rid of Parfitt (I think he’s injured) for Myers (if he’s playing) via DPP with WHE. Then Beams can go to Adams/Merrett/Sloane.

  12. Euman


    May 4, 2017 at 3:01 pm

    OK then if not Sloane (already have Rocky) – Titch or Ablett is he back dare I pick him will he get injured? hes good price

  13. Euman


    May 4, 2017 at 3:39 pm

    Which 2 would you field, WHE, ANB, & Balic

    • Guy Incognito

      May 4, 2017 at 4:01 pm

      WHE and Balic… ANB’s role seems to have changed with Lewis (and Tyson) playing.
      Ave with both Tyson and Lewis = 45.5
      Ave with 1 of Tyson and Lewis = 109.3
      Pretty small sample but not great

      • Diesel

        May 4, 2017 at 4:54 pm

        Those are some damning stats. Hoping it’s more of a coincidence. I think I might go ANB over Balic this week.

  14. Brad

    May 4, 2017 at 9:15 pm

    Dont know still who too choose out of Jacobs and grundy.. arghh

  15. Will

    May 4, 2017 at 9:40 pm

    worth getting barrett for cash grab?

  16. Lance Franklin

    May 5, 2017 at 9:50 am

    Lance Franklin
    May 5, 2017
    Hey dummy great article and another great read!
    I have Nank, Pruess and Beams.

    Current trades are:
    1. Pruess -> Soldo and Beams -> Merrett (169k remaining)
    2. Pruess -> Grundy and Beams -> Myers (209k remaining)
    3. Nank -> Grundy and Beams -> Hannabery (28k remaining)

    The decision is hard boys and girls and I need help pls – I think grundy is better then Jacobs at the moment

Leave a Reply





More in Versus