One down, 23 to go!
Everyone was at the mercy of the fantasy gods last weekend and fielding/benching the right/wrong rookies was probably the only difference between our teams. At times this season, hell at times EVERY season, we are going to get screwed over by the rookie roulette. It is inevitable. Even the ‘rookie expert’ copped it. I lost 89 points by fielding Blakiston and Lindsay over Grlj and Jaques this round – but, I gained 44 points by fielding Robertson over Lombard. Swings and roundabouts.
It’s annoying to see triple-figure scores on your bench, but the fantasy season moves on quickly and so must we. Coaches have an abundance of cash cow options to target this week and the priority with our first pair of trades is to identify those money makers and bring them in before they soar in value. That means that a lot of us may have $500K-$1.3M to spend over the next month or so and our vanilla starting teams will quickly start to look very different.
Rookies/cash cows are typically defined as players priced at $400,000 or lower to commence the season
Cash Cow King – Round 1
A few quick housekeeping items. First, I’ve taken the voting platform for the Cash Cow King to Twitter (I refuse to call it X), it’s way easier to use. Second, as a result there are only four nominees each week now. Third, there may be times when I overrule a top scorer in favour of a rookie/cash cow who is more fantasy relevant. Unfortunately for Sam Grlj, I’m not doing it this week.
Now, how about them rooks! We aren’t accustomed to having rookies score so well in AFL Fantasy – especially straight out of the gate to start a season. It’s possible that you scored a combined 315 points from Jagga, Jaques and Dev Rob this week and we are all hopeful that the scoring ways will continue during the bye rounds.
Defenders
Let ’em grow
What a start for the defensive rookies! I mean coaches who benched Lachie Jaques ($384K, 112, BE -47) will understandably be filthy, especially if you also had Sam Grlj ($371K, 90, BE -8) sitting next to him at D8. Still, the success of this duo and a few of their cash cow comrades has some of us considering a restructure to bring three DEF’s onto the field. They were a step behind, but you can’t be unhappy with what Jai Serong ($366K, 59, BE -6) or Josh Lindsay ($310K, 66, BE 1) dished up – although the West Coast debutant saved his score in a massive way with 35 points in 11 minutes during the last quarter. This group should all continue to generate love as on-field options with their cash generation off to a flying start.
There isn’t anything we need to worry about this week, however coaches need to somewhat prepare for the absence of Jaques and Serong in Round 3. Most coaches will be able to deploy another rookie in that spot – perhaps, Lachie Blakiston ($404K, 47, BE 32). It was an annoying finish to Friday night for Blakiston after he looked to be well on pace for a 65+ outing – a score that fantasy coaches would have well and truly taken. It wasn’t meant to be though with a stat line of three hitouts and three free kicks against in the 4th quarter. I’m backing the big man in to respond vs. Port Adelaide and post a score in that 65+ range. With that being said, I can see why people are giving him the flick given the lack of obvious trade-out candidates.
Let ’em go
There aren’t any defensive rookies that I feel like we need to immediately cull from our teams. Except for Zeke Uwland ($344K, 19, BE 39). I can understand the low time on ground (66%) for a player easing his way into his AFL career, but how the f*** do you only gather five possessions in a 10-goal win against the Eagles? Hell, even the bloody back-up key defender Oscar Adams had six bloody disposals! It’s not good and anyone who took the punt hoping that ‘Zeke the Freak’ would show up to start the season has been left with a sour taste in their mouth. Hardly a must-trade issue, but I’m convinced that the score we saw from Michael Sellwood ($299K, 39, BE 1) this weekend was a much truer reflection of his fantasy output. I’m sure he’s a lovely guy, however that doesn’t mean he needs to be in your squad of 30.
Midfielders
Let ’em grow
I don’t know about you, but Round 2 is looking VERY rookie-heavy in my midfield line. West Coast first-gamers Milan Murdock ($292K, 95, BE -26) and Willem Duursma ($378K, 69, BE 10) have made their way up to M3 and M4 to cover bye players this week and I will be stoked if they even get close to the scores they posted vs. the Suns. Part of the reason why those two find themselves so high up in the pecking order for Round 2 is because of the absence of Jagga Smith ($381K, 99, BE -41) who, it’s fair to say, has started his fantasy career well. While there will be times this year when I give Jagga plenty of love, I promise I won’t waffle on about how many keeper leagues I drafted him in and how stoked I am to finally see him playing footy. Scouts honour.
There are ample additional cash cows who are in line for an on-field berth this weekend, with Tom Blamires ($276K, 77, BE -14) another largely unknown character who excelled in game No. 1. He recorded almost 400 metres gained on debut and the Kangaroos weren’t afraid to get the ball in his hands. Big tick moving forward. Another rookie with MID status who features in the backline is born-again defender, Jack Carroll ($419K, 58, BE 3). While he doesn’t come with the same amount of optimism right now, I’m hopeful that he can play his role over the next fortnight before St Kilda’s bye. Ideally, he’ll post a few scores that contribute to our best-18 and then we can cash him in come Round 4.
Let ’em go
Straight off the bat, there’s no advantage to trading in cash cows who are having the week off. Dan Annable ($346K, 53, BE 17) was good on debut in a hefty loss to the Swans and I’ve been a big James Tunstil ($288K, 66, BE -3) for years. However, trading into a rookie on the bye is fraught with danger and I think we need to see this duo again before we take the plunge and trade into them. Jack Watkins ($250K, 47, BE 6) falls into a similar basket and I apologise to the fantasy faithful who I told to choose him over Murdock. Clearly, even with a sprinkling of CBA’s, Watkins couldn’t find a way to post a respectable score last round, although that should change this week against Essendon. Speaking of the Dons, Dyson Sharp ($318K, 50, BE ) finds himself on the chopping block for a few coaches after gathering just six disposals and needing two goals to crack the half-century. While I still have high hopes for Sharp, swapping him for Murdock, Cook, Grlj or Blamires is a smart tactic.
Rucks
Let ’em grow
I think we can give the Lachlan McAndrew ($322K, 71, BE -1) experiment a tick after one week. Scoring 71 against a respectable ruckman in Darcy Cameron bodes well for his future output – although, things don’t get easier with a matchup against Tim English on Friday night. Just over 2,000 coaches are opting to use Gulden’s injury as a way to grab a bona fide R2 in Luke Jackson, but I still have faith that Brother McAndrew can score at a reasonable clip and play his role for those who keep fielding him.
There were a few other cheap rucks who managed to make money last week, with Zane Zakostelsky ($298K, 49, BE -3) still my favourite of the bunch. It will be interesting to see where he resides following Brisbane’s bye, and there are 44% of us who are hopeful that Chris Fagan will keep playing him. Mitch Edwards ($244K, 40, BE 10) could also get a continued run if he holds his place in Geelong’s side, while Cooper Duff-Tytler ($352K, 40, BE 20) is another rare R3 green dot who is making money. Slowly, but it still counts.
Forwards
Let ’em grow
A coin flip decision for some between Deven Robertson ($301K, 104, BE -31) and Leo Lombard ($337K, 60, BE -15) was a perfect example of the rookie roulette in full effect. For future reference, we should probably start the midfielder over the half forward. Negative breakevens indicate that there is still a lot of cash to be made for this pair and you could run a lineup that fields both of these rooks, given the uncertainty around some of the mid-pricers. The other cash cow I’d feel comfortable placing at F5 or F6 is Brayden Cook ($386K, 84, BE 0) with his ownership soaring after his stellar outing against the Magpies.
I’ll admit, I was indifferent about Cook. I watched his AAMI performance closely and couldn’t justify spending the extra $100K or so on him over some of our cheaper forwards. However, after a balanced performance in Round 1 and with Matthew Nicks pumping him up in the post-match presser, I’m one of the 9,000 or so coaches adding Cook to my mix this week. You should probably do the same. Adding Cook doesn’t mean I’ll be chopping Lachie Dovaston ($312K, 56, BE 9) though, with the Kangaroos’ small forward flirting with a 60-point score without even hitting the scoreboard. High tackle numbers at every level he plays gives me hope that Dovaston will outperform the “slow burn, small forward” label and contribute some pop scores.
Let ’em go
The quick cash grab play by starting Ty Gallop ($309K, 16, BE 20) sounded good in theory, but the Lions tall clearly didn’t get the memo. A strong score in Round 0 convinced some of us that Gallop was the right option at F8, although he’ll now just be shown the door for one of the more reliable rookies we missed. It would be unfair to lump Todd Marshall ($396K, 43, BE 34) in with Gallop after Port’s versatile tall posted a 38-point first half against North. An ankle complaint ended his day prematurely, but if Marshall gets up for this clash with the Bombers, I’d be tempted to give him another run.
Q & A
The weekly Q&A section aims to address the biggest rookie/cash cow issues that we are facing. If I don’t get to your answer in the article, I promise I’ll answer it on Twitter – and as always, you can drop your follow-up questions below.
Only Rookies I’m missing are Murdock, Cook and Lindsay. Not fussed about Lindsay but do I go Errol and Lohmann to the two rookies or do I bring in Merrett and Cook and wait on Murdock
— Errol Gulden’s Left Boot (@StarTraiders) March 17, 2026
The classic conundrum that every coach faces this week – do I grab another premo for Errol Gulden or do I grab the rookie and cash up? Personally, I think we are still early enough in the season to prioritise rookies and cash generation over premium points. Yes, we obviously have to score points to win the game, but Murdock, Cook and even Lindsay could generate another $200K-$300K from this point of the season. It hurts in the short term not grabbing a gun MID, but it will pay off in the long run.
Hi Fry is it worth it to drop a mid pricer that didn’t impress for a rookie like W Duursma? I’m already getting Cook in this week and have all the other ‘must have’ rookies. Thanks
— Olivier Calvi (@oliviercalvi06) March 17, 2026
In short, yes. For me this week, it’s Colby McKercher that is getting the chop and with the injury to Gulden added into the mix, a lot of coaches are going to be LOADED for upgrades over the next few weeks. That doesn’t mean we have to spend it if there are rookies you desire on the outside looking in. A patch-up trade from a failed mid-pricer to a cash cow moving in the right direction is an ideal move this round.
If Marshall plays is he still a trade
— kade burress (@burress_kade) March 17, 2026
I don’t think so. If you need to give him the flick to grab one of the rookies you missed then by all means, pull the trigger. However, there were signs of life from Marshall in the first half against the Roos. If he doesn’t get up, it’s an easy decision, although I wouldn’t be surprised if he came out and gave you a best-18 score in a fantasy-friendly matchup vs. Essendon.
Which 2 to pick of Duursma, Murdock or Cook?
— Matthew Cupo (@mattcupo23) March 17, 2026
This is a ripper question. The Eagles boys should have an extended leash when it comes to job security, but I think the DPP that Cook comes with is a very handy tool – especially when it comes to plugging holes throughout the byes. Duursma will still have good scoring outings, however I think the correct answer is the mature-agers in Murdock and Cook.
How does Gothard compare to Cook?
Thanks!— Puddy’sPigs (@Sheezel54) March 16, 2026
Phoenix Gothard isn’t really a rookie who I have on my radar. He scored at a solid rate against the Bulldogs, but it seems like everyone is able to do that this season! A few tackles and goals helped him surpass 65, however I don’t think he’ll be able to do that week in, week out. An upcoming bye in Round 4 is the other factor working against Gothard – I’d rather pay the extra $$$ and own Cook.
Remember the Name
In no particular order, here are some of the other rookie-priced players to consider throughout the season.
DEFENDERS
Jacob Farrow (Bombers, $314K)
Charlie Edwards (Crows, $230K)
Wade Derksen (Blues, $230K)
James Leake (Giants, $262K)
Dylan Patterson (Suns, $334K)
Oskar Taylor (Giants, $294K)
Lachlan Carmichael (Bulldogs, $270K)
Cooper Simpson (Dockers, $340K)
Matt Whitlock (Kangaroos, $230K)
Harrison Ramm (Power, $268K)
MIDFIELDERS
Harry DeMattia (Magpies, $230K)
Josh Smillie (Tigers, $230K)
Luke Urquart (Kangaroos, $230K)
Adam Sweid (Dockers, $254K)
Harry Kyle (Swans, $298K)
Tyan Prindable (Magpies, $230K)
Luke Beecken (Lions, $230K)
Sam Cumming (Tigers, $326K)
Jack Dalton (Hawks, $230K)
Ollie Greeves (Hawks, $230K)
Patrick Retschko (Tigers, $230K)
Ben Camporeale (Blues, $230K)
Sam Swadling (Magpies, $230K)
RUCKMEN
Aidan Schubert (Hawks, $262K)
Kayle Gerreyn (Bombers, $230K)
Max Heath (Demons, $376K)
Callum Coleman-Jones (Kangaroos, $230K)
Oscar Steene (Magpies, $230K)
FORWARDS
Sid Draper (Crows, $307K)
Sullivan Robey (Bombers, $318K)
Talor Byrne (Blues, $230K)
Jacob Newton (Eagles, $230K)
Toby Murray (Crows, $230K)
Finlay Macrae (Eagles, $293K)
Mitchell Marsh (Crows, $266K)
Charlie Banfield (Saints, $230K)
Harvey Harrison (Magpies, $300K)
Jay Polkinghorne (Cats, $230K)




how many rookies on field is too many? I’ve got 8 for covering byes
Obviously, the fewer the better. This week though I’m looking at 9 so you’re not along mate!
Are these two defenders trade in options for Blakiston:
To be honest, I’d prefer Blakiston over both Allan and Gibcus. The only way I’d be happy dealing Blakiston is if you were grabbing Grlj, Murdock or Cook
Hey Fry thanks mate! How would you rank the trade out options of Rivers, Windsor, Blakiston, Steele, Parish. I already own Murdoch, and faded Gulden – I really don’t like any of the premo options, hence I’m thinking Windsor to Cook and then some other trade. 385K ITB pre trades. As you can tell I’m kinda rattled!
My pleasure mate!
I think Windsor is the one I would chop first if it was my team, so him to Cook makes sense. I’d probably look to shuffle rookies if need be with my second trade, but there’s no clear cut choice. I feel a bit of the similar way regarding the options this week although a move up to Dawson from someone is never going to be a bad option
Yeah to be honest I have pretty much all of the rookies – after the first trade, I’ve got Jaques, Grlj, Lindsay, Serong, Carroll, Blamires, Cook, Murdock, Lombard, Robertson and Marshall. I was thinking maybe cutting Rivers before Windsor, primarily because I feel they will score similarly being 300k apart, hence cutting the more expensive one. Next trade might just be the other one though! Would come down to Rivers/Parish/Steele for the last trade. Just spitting my thoughts onto the page!
Yeah to be honest that does make a lot more sense. Rivers was the victim of the 5th player on the bench and had his low TOG, I just back him in over Windsor to be a best-18 scorer this round. It’s a safe space mate – fire away haha
Thanks mate. Then would you trade Parish or Steele first? I just think Parish still has cash to make, whereas Steele will be a nothing pick who if anything leaks cash. Windsor –> Cook, Parish/Steele –> Ash/Callaghan/Dawson. Still carries 550K to next week.
I’d flick Steele before Parish at this stage mate
Hey Fry,
Great to have you back again this year. love your work.
Thoughts on these trades:
Gulden –> Serong
Mckercher –> Cook
620k ITB.
Thinking to spend extra for Cook as he has a defensive/wing sort of role compared to Murdock’s half fwd role. Otherwise i could do a double downgrade and get murdock instead of serong and prioritise the cash gen. What are your thoughts?
Thanks,
Roy
Thanks Uncle Roy!
As someone who is in a near identical position, I’m prioritising cash gen and going Murdock over another premo. Doesn’t mean it’s the right call, but I think considering how early in the season we are, it’s ideal to have the money makers in our squad. Hope that helps.
Hey fry, Looking at my team not a great start.
I’m thinking 1st trade Gulden to Murdoch
2nd Mckercher to Cook or Milera?
Is it better to bank some cash 800k or Lots 1239k by going Cook instead of Milera this week?
So question is points or cash gen?
Your thoughts
Or should I get a primo now in Ash? Don’t have many on R4 bye.
My exact trades this week are the same: Colby/Gulden OUT, Murdock/Cook IN. It feels wrong carrying so much money over, but the only other route I’m considering is grabbing Merrett for Gulden. However, with that $$$ in the bank I can look at guys like Holmes, Dunkley, even Miers up FWD etc. So I think I’m going to take the short-term hit and upgrade next week
Hello fellow fantasy gurus traded in a red dot last week to get English vc and Jacques 112 do I hold the red dot and trade Colby or trade the red dot. Gulden is going and getting Cook and Murdoch
Thanks
I’d trade the red dot and hope that Colby pops off – the red dot is giving you nothing at the moment with bye players able to be used for loophole purposes
Hey Fry, was great to finally see your lovely face in last week’s rookies podcast with Bails. Who do I trade out to Cook – Roberts, Mckercher or X Lindsay?
Glad I got the call up to talk rooks! I think Kerch goes first out of that trio
Hey Fry,
Loved the article.
I Have Walsh but if he has a 99 and a 100 with 99 in preseason does that tell us that is what he’s gonna get because if it is I will trade him.
Currently I have:
Phillipou to Cook
Walsh to Murdock
Next week I’ll go for Bazlenka, Holmes Zorko or someone else of the like.
I’m holding Walsh, I think there’s been patches where he could have been used or missed a tackle and he’s had the rough rub of the grain. A few extra stats a quarter and he’s pushing a 110 AVG, so I’m willing to give him another chance
Hey,
I’m currently trading gulden for murdock but need help choosing the second player i fade. I want to get cook in but not sure who for. Currently debating between Sharp, Roberts, Blakiston and maybe Carroll if he wont generate any more cash? What do you reckon i go for
If Carroll is dropped tonight, that makes the decision easy. I still think he’ll hold so if that’s the case then Sharp can go.
Hey mate thanks for the article!
I am bringing in Cook. I don’t know whether to trade out Gallop or Sharp though?
He’ll be on the bench if it’s the former, or he will be taking Sharps spot on the field if i go the latter. (May squeeze a bit more cash out of Sharp VS would be handy having a mid DPP)
Thanks in advance!
My pleasure Waz! Gallop goes ahead of Sharp 99 times out of 100. It’s a bit annoying that Cook won’t be on your field in this scenario but there’s clearly one guy there who is a better fantasy prospect and it isn’t Gallop lol.
Hey Fry, great to have you back again!
I’m stuck on who to field up fwd and don’t have anyone on a bye to loop.
Which 2 would you field out of Cook, Lalor, Lombard, Robertson?
I think I’d go Cook and Robertson from that group mate, but it’s a bloody close one!
G’day, great write up! What do you prefer?
1 Colby & gallop for Murdock & Cook
2 Colby & gallop for W Milera & Murdock
3 Blackiston & gallop for Murdock & Cook
Was glued on 3 all week but after hearing more manager time for Colby – I am not sure. Love his match up but also love Milera’s role.
Cheers!
Cheers Toddles!
I like the first one with $$$ to spend next week
Cheers Fry! First trade will likely shift Sharp to Murdock and then have the following options:
a) Carroll to Cook
b) Steele to Callaghan/Serong
c) Steele to Cook + about 650k
What do ya reckon?
Carroll to Cook for me mate
Heu Fry, thanks for the excellent article! Am I crazy to be strongly considering bringing in J. Watkins over B. Cook?
Cook SANFL averages 13 disposals + 1.4 goals per game. Watkins averages 27 disposals in VFL/SANFL, with B&Fs mixed in for good measure? Could it be he just had a down game and Cook had an up game?
Is there any significant info out there that suggests Cook is the clearly better option, apart from the tiny 1 game sample size? Please help me!
Hey mate, I think 2026 is a new season – so a lot of the previous numbers from Cook may not have a true reflection of what he brings. He’s probably going to score around the 55-65 mark, but his job security is WAY better than Watkins. I’d back Cook in.