So it’s almost finals time. Pre-empting my top four finish (yeah right), I’m using my last two trades this week but for those of you who are good coaches or have been lucky enough to avoid this year’s carnage, you still might a have a few left at your disposal. My good friend Kane falls into the ‘good coach’ category and last week reminded me that, at this point of the season, the guys we bring in will be with us for our tilt at the flag. With that in mind, he insisted that it’s essential to make sure the guys we upgrade to have a good finals draw and can smash out tons when we need them most. Hopefully the following can help you make the right decision if you’re tossing up between a few different upgrade options. Also, it might reveal who should be on your field during different weeks of finals.
Basically, I’ve put together a pretty rudimentary formula to project how the best DT players will score in each of our four DT finals matches. I’ve only considered the top 20 players (based on season average) in each position, who have played at least 8 games. Today I start with the defensive options.
For those interested in the maths, I’ve used a weighting to determine the projections. I assume it probably shares some loose similarities to that used by Assistant Coach, although it’s probably more realistic, given that I rarely get within 200 points of my Assistant Coach’s absurd projection. I’ve only included data from the last two years because I reckon some teams have changed tactics/coaches since 2010 (i.e. West Coast). I appreciate that’s not the case for all teams (i.e Freo, who have been consistently shit since 1995 and should just fold), but I’ve tried to make it as relevant as possible.
The weightings are as follows:
45%
Player’s current season average (straight out of DT website)
+
30%
Player’s average against opponent over this season and last (injury/sub-affected scores omitted).
+
25%
Player’s average at the venue over this season and last (injury/sub-affected scores omitted).
=
Projected score
So here goes…
Player |
Price |
F1 |
Score |
F2 |
Score |
SF |
Score |
GF |
Score |
Finals Average |
|
Brett Deledio |
$500,300 |
WB |
106 |
FRE |
104 |
ESS |
110 |
PT |
106 |
107 |
|
Andrew Carrazzo |
$437,000 |
BRIS |
98 |
ESS |
109 |
GC |
89 |
STK |
100 |
99 |
|
Beau Waters |
$450,000 |
GEE |
109 |
PT |
81 |
COL |
98 |
HAW |
106 |
99 |
|
Heath Scotland |
$424,100 |
BRIS |
100 |
ESS |
102 |
GC |
90 |
STK |
98 |
97 |
|
Grant Birchall |
$428,300 |
PT |
91 |
GC |
94 |
SYD |
98 |
WCE |
95 |
95 |
|
Brendon Goddard |
$390,900 |
MEL |
88 |
GEE |
89 |
GWS |
95 |
CARL |
92 |
91 |
|
Jack Grimes |
$385,600 |
STK |
94 |
GWS |
92 |
ADE |
86 |
FRE |
89 |
90 |
|
Matthew Suckling |
$382,300 |
PT |
88 |
GC |
91 |
SYD |
83 |
WCE |
88 |
87 |
|
Dyson Heppell |
$375,800 |
NME |
80 |
CAR |
86 |
RIC |
89 |
COLL |
93 |
87 |
|
Corey Enright |
$403,100 |
WCE |
80 |
STK |
87 |
WB |
90 |
SYD |
90 |
87 |
|
Pearce Hanley |
$431,100 |
CAR |
74 |
ADE |
90 |
PTA |
91 |
WB |
90 |
86 |
|
Heath Shaw |
$374,200 |
SYD |
72 |
NME |
85 |
WCE |
92 |
ESS |
94 |
86 |
|
Jed Adcock |
$373,100 |
CAR |
74 |
ADE |
78 |
PTA |
90 |
WB |
85 |
82 |
|
Jason Gram |
$363,000 |
MEL |
78 |
GEE |
86 |
GWS |
81 |
CARL |
80 |
81 |
|
Brent Guerra |
$332,500 |
PT |
76 |
GC |
72 |
SYD |
90 |
WCE |
79 |
79 |
|
Greg Broughton |
$326,000 |
ADE |
76 |
RIC |
80 |
NME |
90 |
MEL |
70 |
79 |
|
Shannon Hurn |
$361,900 |
GEE |
77 |
PT |
78 |
COL |
90 |
HAW |
69 |
79 |
|
Brian Lake |
$355,800 |
RIC |
69 |
SYD |
69 |
GEE |
90 |
BRI |
79 |
77 |
|
Nathan Grima |
$341,200 |
ESS |
65 |
COL |
71 |
FRE |
90 |
GWS |
79 |
76 |
|
Michael Johnson |
$375,200 |
ADE |
76 |
RIC |
74 |
NME |
73 |
MEL |
75 |
75 |
The verdict
If you don’t have Lids, it’s pretty safe to say that you’re the dream team coach equivalent of Jack Anthony and won’t be anywhere near finals, let alone literate and reading this, so we’ll skip him. Carrazzo’s going to smash the last four games and Scotland won’t be far behind so they should be locks if you can afford them. It looks like anyone who held on to Waters might just be a genius (especially given his GF projection), as long as he gets himself back soon. For those of you who traded him, I hope it was to Birch who looks like a solid alternative. The most interesting finding of the analysis might be Jack Grimes, who is projected to be the seventh best defender during finals and should also provide a reasonable point of difference – definitely one to consider. There shouldn’t be too much separating Enright and Suckling, but each finishes season with a tricky match so I might even be inclined to stay away. Finally, if you’ve cemented a top 4 position and are confident you’ll win your qualifying final, Heath Shaw or HepD might be smokies as they should get better the deeper into finals you progress. I don’t think anyone else in this group is a viable option, least of all the Fremantle duo who will be too busy being shit to win you your league.
Midfielders to follow.
All the best,
Emma Gemma Jnr.
Recent Comments