Name:Â Dayne Beams
Club:Â Collingwood
Position:Â Midfielder
AFL Fantasy:Â Approx. $498,800
AFL Dream Team: $497,300
Bye Round:Â Round 8 (shared with ADL, GEE, NTH, GCS, RIC)
2014 Average:Â 101.1
2014 Games Played:Â 7
Predicted Average:Â 114
Why should I pick him?
Short answer: heâs a future pig and insanely under-priced. Letâs take a quick look at the rise of Beams as a fantasy studâŠ
2011: Beams first burst on the scene in the latter stages of season 2011, capturing our attention with 5 straight tons â three of which were 128 or more â topping off what was already a solid year for the young ball magnet. He finished with an average of 101.6 that season, but it was his further classification as a DPP in the following season which really thrust him front and centre in the race to $50k.
2012: Many of us will fondly remember â12 as the year of the MID/FWD â budding stars such as Dangerfield, Sidebottom, Robinson and Zaharakis were all popular choices from the talent-shallow forward pool. However, thanks to a combination of a hefty 101-point price-tag and the well-known shin splint issues that forced him to miss all of the NAB Cup and even Round 1, Beams wasnât invited to the party. After three mediocre scores of 74, 93, and 85 upon return, it didn’t look like it was going to be this particular Pieâs year. ThenâŠ.Bang! A fantasy piglet waddled over to the Dream Team trough, and once he started feasting, he didn’t stop. In the remaining 18 games of the year, Beamer averaged a whopping 121.9 DT points, including just the single score below the hallowed three-figure mark.
2013: Once again, Dayneâs season was derailed early by injury, crucifying many coaches along the way with his Round 1 late withdrawal with a thigh ailment, despite playing over the NAB Cup without any reported issues. His season debut wasnât until Round 16 â an 80-point effort against the Crows â and by now many of us had lost faith that Beams could be fantasy relevant in 2013. Cue scores of 134, 130 and 117 in the next three weeks.
So, why the lengthy trip down memory lane? Well, hopefully itâs highlighted the strong correlation between fitness and massive fantasy scores from Beamer. Heâs an out-and-out gun, one of the few in the prestigious group that pump out elite disposal numbers while impacting the scoreboard. Only three players averaged 30+ disposals and 1.2+ goals per game in 2012 â Ablett, Swan and Beams.
Did I mention that heâs likely going to get a 9% discount this year, based on the discounts weâve seen so far? Thatâs right. Thanks to playing just the 7 games last season, we wonât be paying a price-tag that befits a 101.1 averaging player â weâll be shelling out the equivalent of a 92 average for the superstar-in-waiting. I feel like I should be saying this in a âcrazy warehouse guyâ voice, thatâs how massive a bargain Beamer will be at sub-$500k.
Ask yourself this; If Beams was able to churn out 122 points a game in 2012 without a pre-season, 101 points a game last year without any match fitness base⊠what can the guy do with a solid off-season?
Itâs a scary thought.
Why shouldnât I pick him?
Itâs hard to come up with anything except Ifâs, Butâs and Maybeâs here, but Iâll include them for argumentâs sake. Just know that I could have just as easy left this section blank.
What if heâs not durable? Thatâs a defensible statement to make, given Beams does have a spotty health record. A foot fracture in 2011, shin splints in early 2012 and the long-term thigh issues that plagued him this season make for uneasy reading. However, Iâm not concerned. Heâs nowhere near the Grimes/Higgins basket yet, and these seem more like issues that most young players go through as they gradually adapt to the incredible trauma that AFL players put their bodies through each year.
But maybe heâll get tagged? Possible, but with the damaging Pendlebury needing constant attention and Swan still plugging away at an elite level, I canât see Beams attracting a significant tag on a regular basis. Worst case scenario is something like Pies vs Freo, where Pendles gets the Crowley tag and Lyon opts to send De Boer to Beams instead of Swan, to mix things up a bit. Hardly unbreakable, and remember, this is the worst case scenario.
Maybe the Pies will suck? The implied assumption here is that players find it harder to score in less successful teams. An interesting stat â in every season that Dane Swan has averaged over 100, the Pies have finished 7th or better on the ladder. How much ‘help’ does a DTer really get from playing in a successful team? What does the scoring of Beams and co. look like if the Magpies sink into the bottom half of the table? Weâll likely never know. They did just deal significant pieces in Dale Thomas and Heath Shaw, but with the core of the club still intact and a swathe of young talent in the wings, itâs hard to predict a significant drop off from Collingwood. Plus, given the elite ball-winning ability of Swan, Pendles, Beams and Sidebottom, the Pies wonât be detracting from a possession-happy playing style any time soon.
And donât even think about telling me that youâre considering not picking him because of his Round 8 bye, chock-full with other Premium midfield options like Swan, Pendlebury, Ablett, J. Selwood, Cotchin and Dangerfield. Canât fit them all in, you say? True, but if Beams isnât your first picked of that lot simply on a value basis, then youâre a fool. Save that argument for the pricey Swan and Ablett dilemmas, not for the irresistible bargain staring you right in the face.
Deck of DT Rating.
ACEÂ â He might be priced like a King, but make no mistake, this guy will produce like an Ace. The fact that heâs discounted on an already naturally discounted 101-average is pretty much the reason why vouchers always have the âcannot be used in conjunction with any other offerâ disclaimer asterisked at the bottom. He’s basically 20 points under-priced as a result.
Anyway, I’ve probably just used a lot of words above to say what could have been summed up in two: Absolute. Lock.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER: @Tbetta9 for all things fantasy.
Recent Comments